1.I took a personalty Jung test, and answered a yes or a no to each characteristic question. My reaction to this test was that it really confused me, the only thing that was true about was that I am very extroverted. Other than that, the other percentages were very off. According to the test i am an ENFJ. I feel this test is not valid.
2. I took a 122 questioned test about personality and rated each characteristic from 1-9. My reaction to this test was that there were a lot of charcteristcs explaining my personality well. I think this test is very valid.
3. This test is like the second one, only this says i am more sympathetic toward others, which is true. This test is valid.
4. I took the attractive test, which was valid. It showed that I go toward extremely attractive men, who are trendy and really smart.
5. This test was not valid because they did not ask enough question that actually pertain to me. My eq was 45-54.
7 comments:
Great job. You provided a detailed analysis of each test and whether or not you felt it was accurate. I sometimes wonder how people come up with these tests since they are often dead wrong. On the other hand some tests can be really accurate.
The reason why the Jung test might not have been valid might have been because some people are just "yes" or "no" fir some of those questions. A lot of times people are somewhere in the middle.
I wish you could have expaned on some of your results, but it was interesting to read!
could have expanded just a little, and i have to agree i didn't think the eq test was accurate either
You could've gone a little more into detail with your results, but I agree that the Jung Typology test isn't very accurate. And with the Attractiveness Test, you go for really smart people.. my results said I don't prefer people with that characteristic. Haha!
I liked that you analyzed your results as opposed to just posting them. Great Job!!
Very good analysis and overall very interesting blog. great job!
Post a Comment